Tennessee Valley Overture Seeks to Affirm "Unordained Deaconesses"

With Overture 16, Tennessee Valley Presbytery has asked the PCA’s 38th General Assembly to affirm that “unordained deaconesses may serve the church to the glory of God.”

The latest overture stands in opposition to Overtures 2, 9, and 13, which seek to amend the Book of Church Order 9-7 by adding the following language: “… assistants to the deacons shall not be referred to as deacons or deaconesses, nor are they to be elected by the congregation nor formally commissioned, ordained, or installed as though they were office bearers in the church.”

Overture 16 notes “a history of disagreement within our Reformed and Presbyterian circles concerning the exegesis of Romans 16:1.” It also asserts differences regarding 1 Timothy 3:11 and the translation of “woman” or “wife” and the subsequent implications.

In support of its position the Overture cites the longstanding practice of the Reformed Presbyterian Church Evangelical Synod (RPCES), prior to that denomination’s joining the PCA. It further states that in “most of our congregations that have held to this practice there has been no dissension concerning the ordination of women … .”

With reference to 1 Timothy 5:9-10, the Tennessee Valley overture claims that there is “enough biblical evidence to support the theory … that women did serve the early church in the role of deaconess … .” To disallow what Scripture “might” allow, the Overture says, would “put the rules of men above Scripture.” On that basis, the Overture requests the Assembly to affirm that “deaconesses may serve the church to the glory of God.”

To view this and other overtures, please visit the 38th General Assembly website.

Comments

All Fields Are Required:


Eugene


Betts


First PC, Augusta, GA


Deacons can not fully minister to both genders without assistance from women. These women assistants should be recognized for their contributions, be elected and installed (as women are on other important committees) and have the privilege of the unordained title of deaconess.

2010-04-29 14:58 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Andrew


Barnes


MS


Eugene,

That is very interesting given the specific example of Scripture in Acts 6 where Deacons were first ordained for the very purpose of serving women (and they were all men). God's ways are greater than our thoughts and intentions.

2010-04-30 01:03 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


John


Musgrave


Clayton, NC


Do a Greek concordance search on the words "diakonos" and "diakoneo" (which I did and it was fundamentally revealing and helpful) and one will see that the words were the common terms for "servant" and "serve" in Greek. Jesus, the Apostles, Paul, and the secular governor are all called "diakonos" in the New Testament. Thus, the New Testament itself proves the case that every time someone is called a diakonos, it is not speaking of that person being one who holds the function (not yet speaking of the ordination) of a deacon in the church. Romans 16:1 thus does not show that Phoebe was an ordained or unordained "diakonos" in the church anymore than all secular governors categorically spoken of in Romans 13:4 were to be understood to be set apart in the church for the function of service.

2010-04-29 15:08 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Steve


Cavallaro


AZ


You are correct, the word itself does not signify that. Context is taken into consideration.
No less an conservative exegete as John Calvin though Phoebe had the office of deacon. No accusation of feminism or cultural capitulation can stand in that case.

2010-04-29 16:17 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


William


Lamkin


Florida


"support the theory"? What about factual evidence? Since when do we establish Biblical practices based on "theory"? The two passages in question (Romans 13 and I Timothy 5) do not give us solid evidence or explanation of the term "deaconess" as is done with the terms "elder" and "deacon."

If Paul had explained "deaconess" as carefully as he explained "elder" and "deacon" I'd say let's do this; based on fact, not theory.

2010-04-29 21:05 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


John


Musgrave


Clayton, NC


Yes, context: given that nothing else is said of Phoebe, other than she is a great servant in the church who had helped many, we can use the analogy of Scripture for context. Acts 6, in which the first deacons are chosen, shows the apostles calling not simply for "seven from among you" to serve as deacons (they had the ability to say this in 6:3), but specifically for "seven men from among you." How did the church in Jerusalem understand this call for seven men? By selecting seven men; not six men and one women or any such mix. 100% selected to the office were men, followed by the approving ordination of them by the apostles. Our interpretive rule is that clear passages of Scripture (Acts 6) must be used to interpret the less-clear passages of Scripture (Romans 16:1 & 1 Timothy 3).

2010-04-29 22:07 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Neal


Kegley


Virginia


How about the one "little" issue as specified in the Scriptures 1 Timothy 3:12 --

"...the husband of one wife...."

Seems pretty simple and straight-foward. Why all the continued appeals for something that is not Scriptural?

2010-05-02 20:46 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Steve


Cavallaro


AZ


The "little issue" looking at the text using the alternate meaning of "woman" instead of "wife" is a list of qualifications specific to men and a list of qualifications specific to women. They tend to have different habitual sins.
Seems strange to have a section about the qualifications of their wives after the deacons. Just because it is awkward doesn't mean that isn't what Paul did.
So, not as straightforward as we might think when we look at Scripture in the original language.

2010-05-18 18:24 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Marshall


Stjohn


Signal Mtn, TN


The use of the word "deaconess" will be misleading to all who come to our churches. A lioness is a female lion. An actress is a female actor. A deaconess is a female deacon. That's the natural meaning of the word. If we authorize "deaconesses," people within and without the PCA will be confused. I hope this overture will be cast out or defeated at the GA in Nashville.

2010-05-04 07:27 Permalink Reply

Leave a Comment

All Fields Are Required: