Overtures Committee Says No to Study Committee on Women's Roles
By a vote of 40 to 34 (with two abstentions) the Overtures Committee rejected Overtures 5 and 10 to the 37th General Assembly this afternoon. Both overtures asked that a study committee be formed to consider women’s roles in PCA churches.
According to the overtures, “the PCA has struggled with the question of how women in the local church are to exercise their God-given gifts within the framework of the Book of Church Order (BCO).” The overtures also state that “many PCA churches are uncertain about how to use appropriately God’s gifts among the many capable women within the membership of those churches” and that “in many PCA churches those gifts are under-utilized.”
Earlier this year, Susquehanna Valley Presbytery (Pennsylvania) and James River Presbytery (Virginia) both overtured the Assembly “to authorize the moderator to appoint a study committee representing the diversity of opinion within the PCA to study and report to the 38th General Assembly.” The overtures were later amended to require the committee to make its report into the form of a pastoral letter. That letter would have addressed four questions:
(1) What sorts of roles may women fill in the life of the church?
(2) What are some models of local church practices that have developed as ways of employing the gifts of women in the lives of their congregations that might be exemplary and encouraging to other local churches?
(3) What elements of organization and accountability to ordained leadership can be commended to PCA churches that are consistent with the BCO?
(4) Does our BCO unnecessarily hinder achieving the best utilization of the gifts of PCA women in light of the teaching of Scripture?
The debate over these overtures was long and impassioned. Ruling elder David Snoke of Pittsburgh Presbytery, appealed to commissioners, saying that churches are confused, that women’s roles is an issue, and that in the absence of pastoral advice it’s an issue that will be resolved by discipline.
Greg Thompson of Trinity Presbyterian Church in Charlottesville, Va., noted that the PCA has a diversity of practice, a diversity of perspectives, and therefore a lack of clarity. These are precisely the conditions, Thompson stated, for which a pastoral letter is intended.
David Coffin spoke for many in the majority, saying that in his opinion, it is implausible that [the PCA] is struggling with the use of women’s gifts. “There’s a plethora of material on this issue,” Coffin said. Fred Kuhl of the Potomac Presbytery agreed, saying that the overtures’ arguments were unpersuasive. And David Jarstfer from Westminster Presbytery (Tennessee and Virginia) added, “As elders we’ve got to shepherd our people. … Let’s be elders. Let’s do the work.”
Coffin later added that “we’ve heard speech after speech insisting there’s not clarity or unity.” But the means proposed, he argued, would not provide the desired ends. The study committee/pastoral letter, “will not provide unity. It will not settle or clarify the subject. People who had different views before will have different views after. This may make matters worse.”
Today’s recommendation of the Overtures Committee will be reported to the General Assembly later this week, and commissioners will vote on whether or not to accept it. A minority report may be presented to the Assembly as well, according to commissioner E.J. Nusbaum.
Comments
All Fields Are Required:
Bethnee Haury
Sonoma, CA
All Fields Are Required:
Sheryl
North Carolina
All Fields Are Required:
Charlotte
All Fields Are Required:
Madge
Jacksonville, FL
All Fields Are Required:
Mike McLaughlin
Albuquerque
All Fields Are Required:
Mary Dunn
Morganton, NC
All Fields Are Required:
Martine Extermann
Tampa, Florida
All Fields Are Required:
Jim Pakala
Presbytery of Philadelphia
All Fields Are Required:
Shelly Timbol
Saint Johns, Florida
All Fields Are Required:
John Hendrickson
Middletown NJ
All Fields Are Required:
Donna
Jackson, MS
All Fields Are Required:
Timothy Rott
Gulf Breeze, Florida
All Fields Are Required:
Deb Welch
Newark, DE
Of particular interest to me personally as a single woman, to many of the single mothers that I know, and to the widows is #3 --- What elements of organization and accountability to ordained leadership can be commended to PCA churches that are consistent with the BCO?
In this regard and others, I think the study could have been very constructive and feel just a little disappointed. I do hope that our denom isn't perceived as not having a serious concern for all of its covenant members.
All Fields Are Required:
Sharon Whitley
Pensacola, Florida
All Fields Are Required:
Scott
Cary, North Carolina
The Book of Church Order is not being followed by a few churches. It does not allow electing non officers as if they were (e.g. 'deaconess'), it does not allow refusing to ordain and install deacons, it teaches doctrine of ordination and installation whereby congregations receive the officers whom God has appointed for them.
The confusion or lack of clarity is coming from a very few churches who are violating our constitution- the longer they do so the more it emboldens others and adds to the confusion.
It is a matter of discipline to the constitution and the solemn vows church officers take to uphold the constitution of our church (Westminster Standards, Book of Church Order).
Involving un-ordained men and women in the local church is a responsibility of church officers...and members.
All Fields Are Required:
Robert Wildeman
Fairmont, WV New River Presbytery
All Fields Are Required:
Mark Schnitzer
Buffalo, New York
I know that recently I brought this issue up at a seesion meeting and the idea was tabled in order to keep "peace and purity" in the church. I feel that sometimes that thought, peace and purity, is bantered about in order to keep from discussing hard issues.
Being relatively new to PCA I was hoping that this body, known for it's insight and wisdom in so many areas, would not back away from an issue that would brought freedom and purpose and belonging to at least half of our congregants.
All Fields Are Required:
Dawn
Ohio
is also an excellent source to explore the role of women in the church. As a single women my gifts were only used when no one else was willing to step to the plate. When a man or married couple became available--I was quickly and harshly dismissed. Let us all expore women's gifts and how to be the Ezer or helpmate in the church. As a single women, I begged for the elder's protection and instead received only criticism. I praise God there are roles in the church I can't do.
All Fields Are Required:
Bill Lamkin
Panama City, FL
May the PCA have peace from God as we serve the God of peace together using the different parts to make one beautiful body.
All Fields Are Required:
Lynda
Illinois
So, I don't think that the gap for women's roles is so much where we can do what we're not supposed to do by leading men and such, as it is for us to be better led.
All Fields Are Required:
Val P.
Alabama
I seriously doubt that any pastoral letter will make much difference in any of the outer extreme churches. The only churches it might help would be those honestly trying to find their own church identity and looking for good ideas. To those churches, I'd highly recommend the books by Susan Hunt and Duncan Ligon. There are plenty of helpful materials in those books to start well.
All Fields Are Required:
Randall Bachman
Spring Texas
Even if the GA were to "study the issue" as though that has not been already done ad naseum, it will not change the simple fact that the Apostle of our faith spoke on the issue and Women are not to be pastors. And all these backdoor attempts to worm around this issue are simply dishonest. I am a man, and I am not called to preach either. So I find lots of ways to teach and contribute, and am blessed by these ministries. There are plenty.
There are churches that view the Bible as a wax tablet easily modified to suit the majority's fancy. If you can't submit to scripture, go.
All Fields Are Required:
Leslie Taylor
Colorado Springs
What I don't get is why all these teary-eyed women and disgruntled men don't go join some other denomination--the sky's the limit if your looking for a denomination with a modern-American interpretation of the Apostle Paul. But can't we be allowed to have just one denomination in this country that actually takes serious the word of God--no even delights in the beauty of His creation order of the sexes?
If the PCA is seduced by the world's ideas of sexuality, where then do we go? We who embrace the scripture and the goodness of God to give us parameters for our own good, who love womanhood, and don't seek a loophole so that we can leave our homes pursuit of "ministy."
All Fields Are Required:
Daniel
SW Virginia
Take a look at the main-line Presbyterian denomination. It is radically declining. The PCUSA is losing as many members every year as make up the whole of the PCA. Most of these are leaving the church altogether. They are not going into any denomination...just into the world.
When a denomination abandons the sure and certain Word of God it is finished. This is not new. Just read the Old Testament and see what happen to the Church of the old covenant.
I'll close with a quote (as close as I can remember) from Os Guiness. "He who marries the spirit of the age will soon find himself a widower."
All Fields Are Required:
Phil W.
Dayton, Ohio
All Fields Are Required:
Wesley Wilson
Fairfax, VA
It's not that the committee is saying the church shouldn't consider the issue. They're saying the church shouldn't consider the issue again. This issue has been examined quite a number of times. If an overture can now be formulated that demonstrates that earlier considerations on the issue were flawed, I have no doubt the committee would embrace another examination. This overture, however, failed to even acknowledge that earlier study had been done let alone point out any potential flaws.
All Fields Are Required:
Ken
Mississippi
What do PCA women want to do that they currently are not allowed to do?
Perhaps the answer to those questions would help further the discussion.
All Fields Are Required:
William
Florida
I, for one, do not think women are 2nd rate. They are gifted and, those who serve, are doing so very well.
is there a Biblical basis for a female office? if so, let's do it. If not, let's not invent something the Bible has not given us.
All Fields Are Required:
Warren
SC
All Fields Are Required:
Tom
Vancouver, WA
All Fields Are Required:
Chris R.
Presbytery of Philadelphia
All Fields Are Required:
Patrick Earl
Albuquerque
All Fields Are Required:
Paul Sanders
Calvary Presbytery
All Fields Are Required:
Bobbi
Florida
I didn't realize God's word was only 1950's or present.
Why should God's Church change with the Culture, when IT SHOULD BE Changing the Culture.
All Fields Are Required:
Buddy E
Georgia
All Fields Are Required:
Jim Golden
Paxton, Il
All Fields Are Required:
Henry
Alabama
All Fields Are Required:
Warren
SC
Reading your note, it would seem you are arguing for a change in our standards - not a study committee, as these overtures were requesting.
All Fields Are Required:
Donna
Jackson, MS
All Fields Are Required:
Denise
Mississippi
All Fields Are Required:
Ford Carrigan
Charlotte, NC
All Fields Are Required:
Michael
Serving the Church in Iraq
"A lot of this is begging the question. In what areas do some of our women feel limited?
What do PCA women want to do that they currently are not allowed to do?"
The current debate is about women holding the office of deacon or elder. These are the two roles that the PCA, in light of Scripture and our denomination constitution, has stated is to be held by men only.
However, it is clear that women were used by the NT church in a variety of ways (training other women, missions, evangelism, etc.). In this regard, the women of the PCA should not held back. But I wonder along with Ken, in what way do they feel limited? How are they not being untilized?
All Fields Are Required:
Paige
PA
All Fields Are Required:
Mark Leone
Springfield, VA
For my part, the only answer I can honestly give to the question is that women are not permitted to be church officers.
Isn't this really the goal that many are seeking? Certainly, some commenters here have said as much. Asking the question repeatedly because you do not agree with the answer is not a process conducive to clarity, the stated goal of the overtures. It rather reminds me of Balaam asking God repeatedly whether he could or could not curse Israel.
All Fields Are Required:
Linda
Illinois
(1) What sorts of roles may women fill in the life of the church?
(2) What are some models of local church practices that have developed as ways of employing the gifts of women in the lives of their congregations that might be exemplary and encouraging to other local churches?
(3) What elements of organization and accountability to ordained leadership can be commended to PCA churches that are consistent with the BCO?
(4) Does our BCO unnecessarily hinder achieving the best utilization of the gifts of PCA women in light of the teaching of Scripture?
The answer: "Women are not permitted to be church officers" doesn't actually answer any of these questions.
We can all agree that women ought not be ordained and still not have a clue as to what our answers would be for the above concerns.
All Fields Are Required:
Sara V.
Illinois
We should be equally yoked in marriages as well as in church government, male and female with one master, that is Jesus Christ. Neither male voices nor female voices are sufficient alone. Our church rule is unbalanced and we can't move forward in this condition, but will continue to wander in circles in the wilderness.
I agree with Warren, "If you want a broad based wide ranging study, why on earth don't you have your Presbyteries do it first?"
Let's do it!
All Fields Are Required:
Bobbi
Florida
Why aren't their questions justified?
As a woman, in the PCA, I'm curious, what position can we as women not have other than Pastor, Elder or Deacon?
I can teach a Sunday school class to women--I can teach a Sunday school class of children..Those are HUGE responsibilities in themselves, so why should I care if men are in the class for me to teach? I can be more open with women about my struggles and what God has taught me through His word as I've gone through those things.
I don't think women appreciate the roles and positions they do have, because they are so busy focusing on what they don't have, and that is a shame, as it stirs up strife and drama instead of contentment in serving our Lord.
All Fields Are Required:
Mark Leone
Springfield, VA
My point was that the BCO doesn't raise any hindrances to women applying their gifts in service, except for the restriction on holding church office.
In other denominations, if not our own, calling for studies has often been the beginning of a patient strategy for changing standards when the votes are not yet there. And I think that question 4 essentially takes a careful step clearly in this direction.
Working to change the standards when warranted is a fundamental principle of Presbyterianism, and ding so is not merely our right but our duty.
But even though I personally adhere to the standards on this issue, I would prefer a request to amend them over a request for a study. Since the former approach is more straightforward and involves constitutional process, I believe it is far more conducive to providing the clarity that all participants in the debate agree is needed.
All Fields Are Required:
Sue M.
Ohio
Here are some examples of leadership that don't require ordination and have been held by both men and women in our parish:
* Serve on vestry (similar to a Church Council or Board in other denominations)
* Director of Volunteer Ministries
* Director of Christian Education
* Youth pastor
Are these examples of roles/ministries that are considered off limits to women in the PCA?
All Fields Are Required:
Bobbi
Florida
At our church, women serve in all of those capacities as well. Though none are ordained.
Heck they even hold leadership positions within the school.
We have women who serve as Missionaries, we have women who serve various positions, but NONE of them are Ordained.
And that is what this argument boils down to, they want to be ordained just like men are.
Who have women who teach women's bible study classes, we have women who teach children's during Sunday school, and during church training, we have women who go to visit others in when they are in the hospital, we have women that served on our Pastor Search Committee, so I honestly don't see what these women are complaining about short of being ordained.
All Fields Are Required:
Sue M.
Ohio
I'm so glad to hear that your church supports women who are called to serve in the above ministries. That is wonderful! All of those things require the call of God on your heart -- not do it just because a guy can.
WRT to ordination, I know the pain of having it denied to both a woman and a man in our church because our Episcopalian bishop didn't want to have more orthodox priests in our diocese.
Fortunately, we now are a part of an Anglican denomination and instead of Deacon Nancy and Deacon Kevin we have Mother Nancy and Father Kevin.
I also don't want to put you on the spot, but do male pastors serve as prison chaplains in women's prisons in the PCA? Nancy used to be a prison chaplain and a prerequisite was ordination. Because deacons are ordained, she could serve in this ministry.










All Fields Are Required:
John Hendrickson
Middletown NJ
All Fields Are Required:
Paige
PA