Overtures Committee Rejects Danvers Statement on Gender Issues

By a vote of 60 to five, with seven commissioners abstaining, the Overtures Committee of the 37th General Assembly denied Overture 13 from Grace Presbytery of Mississippi yesterday. The overture had sought to adopt a modified version of the Danvers Statement, issued by the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood in 1988, as the official statement of gender issues of the Presbyterian Church in America.

According to the overture, “the 36th General Assembly gave the impression that the lower courts should discuss [the issue of women’s roles in the church] with a view that a resolution of the issue might be forthcoming. … There is a need to give direction to our local churches as well as respond to the Assembly's suggestion.”

The Danvers Statement is, according to the overture, “a biblically-based Statement on Gender Issues endorsed by Evangelicals and Reformed alike, which has been in circulation for more than 20 years.”

The Overtures Committee responded by saying, “[This] overture seeks to deal with matters of controversy with a lengthy statement whose complex propositions have not been examined in detail by the Church.”

 

Comments

All Fields Are Required:


Bruce Howes


Wilmington, DE



I am glad that the Overtures committee decided to reject this Statement on Gender. Not that I oppose the document (which I confess a general ignorance of), but due to the principle that by adopting these sorts of statements, they take on a quasi confessional status. They thus gain some sort of semi-official doctrinal touchstone that people must agree with.
Thus, it becomes, in effect, a confessional document.
If brethren believe a statement is needed to define role relationships, they can & should seek an addition to the Confession which is constitutionally possible. BCO 26-3.
I have already witnessed our previous statement re:"Auburn Ave Theology" used as a quasi constitutional document. Men coming into Presbytery are asked if they agree (affirm) it. Again, I agree with the thrust of the Previous GA's paper, but am anxious when it us used as a quasi-confessional document.
To paraphrase Ecclesiates 12:12; continue..

2009-06-17 13:22 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Bruce Howes


Wilmington, DE



...(concluded from above) "of the writing of many statements on various issues is endless, and excessive devotion to them is wearing to the body"
PCA is a young denomination. If the Lord so tarries & we exist 500 years from now, imagine how many such "Statements" on (then) important "issues" we could develop by then! Why, we could have our very own PCA Talmud!
We have the Bible. Our Confession is our "spin" on how we understand the Bible (ie we are "Reformed Christians." Thus, the Confession functions as our Mishnah. BCO functions as our "Canon Law". Do we need more? Or, can we trust the Spirit to guide to us (plural) as we walk this side the veil of tears?
Thank you for hearing me!
Blessings!
Bruce Howes
Stated Clerk, Heritage Presbytery
& a chief of sinners


2009-06-17 13:32 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Michaela Flack


Indianapolis, IN



As an aside, it would be helpful for readers to have a link to the overtures themselves, just to save us having to dig around for them to get some more context (if we aren't there).

http://www.pcaac.org/37thovertures.htm

2009-06-17 23:24 Permalink Reply

Leave a Comment

All Fields Are Required: