Joel Belz: Closing Comments on the 37th Assembly

The evidence is about as solid as it can get: The Presbyterian Church in America is a deeply divided body. And some of us couldn’t be more hopeful.

The Thursday afternoon vote on the last day of the PCA’s 37th General Assembly was on an important issue—and it was close. While 446 commissioners said in effect that they neither want to change the PCA’s exclusion of women from the office of deacon, nor even to talk any more about it , 427 of their fellow-churchmen fell barely short in their effort to extend just such a discussion.

Yet while heavy thunder and late spring rains pounded the Orlando convention center where the PCA met this week, remarkable calm pervaded both the huge auditorium where official business was conducted and the broad hallways where that same business was informally discussed and evaluated. In various quarters of the church, the vigorous disagreement had been ballyhooed for months as a threat at least to the PCA’s unity, and maybe even to its existence. But at least in the first few hours after the vote, an uncharacteristic tranquility reigned.

The knockdown, drag-out slugfest predicted for Orlando simply didn’t happen. And the body that emerged at the end of the week may prove to be stronger—and maybe less susceptible to future fevers—because of the experience.

And if “The Great Debate of 2009” didn’t occur within the General Assembly itself, a big part of the reason was that two prominent PCA churchmen humbly backed off the chance to dramatize their personal roles. Instead, they deliberately lowered the stakes in what might come to be known as “The Slightly Lesser Debate of 2009.” Tim Keller, senior pastor at Redeemer PCA in New York City, and Ligon Duncan, senior pastor of First PCA in Jackson, Miss., simply refused to engage in point-scoring when they spent 90 minutes in front of perhaps 750 listeners (with a third of them sitting on the floor) in a late afternoon side room session. What Duncan and Keller provided instead was a rare, up-close model of modesty and civility, with each seeming determined genuinely to out-nice the other.

To pay such high tribute to those two men shouldn’t keep us from noting the parallel leadership exhibited by virtually everyone participating in the debate. The high standards set by Philip Ryken, David Coffin, and E. J. Nusbaum, in particular, should be both studied and mirrored by anyone aspiring to future leadership in our denomination. The quality of argumentation, consistently kept within the context of sweet-spirited and mutual honor, made many rejoice—again—to be part of the PCA.

———

Not everything at the Orlando assembly made the PCA look good. On the crucial vote over women deacons, 873 teaching and ruling elders helped shape the church’s policy for the years ahead. But something like 1,100 had registered and paid to be part of this important assembly. Where were the other 200 pastors and elders when such critical decisions were being made?

———

If the overall cost of accommodations and meals for assembly participants didn’t set records this year, it must have been close. It was tough to find a passable breakfast for less than $12—and by one estimate, the collective bill every time commissioners sat down for a meal was at least $25,000 to $30,000. The number of commissioner complaints about all that may have set a record as well, and may prompt PCA leaders to explore again new ways to hold such assemblies without nudging the denomination and its local churches toward bankruptcy. The fact that this year’s assembly had been scheduled in a relatively plush setting, at a time when so many congregations and denominational programs are struggling financially, added to the embarrassment.

———

But back to a couple of the many reasons for optimism about the PCA. Skeptics were everywhere a couple of years ago when major revisions were made in assembly operations—placing a major part of the debate within a significantly expanded “Overtures Committee” that would be populated each year by one teaching elder and one ruling elder from each of the PCA’s approximately 75 presbyteries. “It’ll never work,” said the doubters. But these days, seldom is heard a discouraging word about the big changes that occurred two years ago. And for those who wondered whether a 150-member Overtures Committee can fairly represent the larger assembly, note this statistic: This year’s recommendation by the Overures Committee on the issue of women deacons (54-46%) proved to be an almost precisely accurate forecast of how the assembly at large voted (51-49%) when it got the chance.

The bigger question may be this: Why, when the Overtures Committee is perceived as the center of influence these days in the overall assembly operation, were only half of that committee’s seats filled by the respective presbytery representatives?

———

I left home early this week, heading for the assembly here in Orlando, and having sung at our evening worship the night before those familiar hymn lines about the church:

... by schisms rent asunder, by heresies oppressed ... .”

Which, I wondered, would be the case in Orlando? Might we possibly be so careless with our doctrine and our handling of the precious truth of the gospel that some would accuse us of the sin of heresy? Or would we look at things so narrowly that we’d be forced to watch the PCA splinter, a little or even a lot—and be accused of promoting the sin of schism?

The hymn writer wasn’t just picking casual, random things that might go wrong in the church. He was pointing to the all-too-real ditches on either side of the road, reminding us not to be distracted from the hard but liberating line of truth.

I think the PCA was blessed to hear that warning this past week in Orlando.

Comments

All Fields Are Required:


Chris Hutchinson


Blacksburg, VA



Thank you to Mr. Belz and By Faith for publishing this frank analysis for those of us unable to attend GA. Very helpful.

2009-06-19 11:42 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Stephen Smallman


Philadelphia



I appreciated Joel's assessment of this year's GA, and particularly the vote on Thursday. Tim Keller made the astute observation that every three or four years the "techtonic plates" within the PCA rub up against one another in significant issues (strict subscription, creationism, women in diaconal ministry, etc.) and after several years of discussion and wrestling a concensus results taking the PCA one more step toward maturity. This doesn't happen in one forum, but is formed through GA debate, SJC decisions, reaction to presbytery decisions (even blogs, I suppose), etc. But it takes time. I believe that is going now with regard to our understanding the role of women in diaconal ministry, and I pray our whole church will be patient and listen to one another and let Jesus build this imperfect branch of his church called the PCA.

2009-06-19 11:48 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Jane Adair


Briarwood Pres-Birmingham, AL



Thank you for this reporting day by day and I loved seeing the photos to sense where you were and how large it looked. This helps us pray better in our hurry, hurry, rush, rush lives. Blessings!!!

2009-06-19 11:55 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Carol Arnold


Winter Springs, Florida



Thank you, Joel, for your beautifully written and accurate closing remarks. In my experience the PCA has championed the gifts and abilities of women in the church, and has mainly focused on what we can do, not what we cannot do. Whatever we are called or labeled, we are co-laborers who serve to build Christ's kingdom around the world.

2009-06-19 11:58 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


sydney knutsen


glen carbon Illinois



Extremely well said, Carol. We at Center Grove Presbyterian Church DO concentrate on what women can do and not on what they cannot. This, in turn, unifies us to build UP the body of Christ. Thank you for your comments.

2009-06-21 09:55 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Wayne Sparkman


St. Louis, MO



"The fact that this year’s assembly had been scheduled in a relatively plush setting, at a time when so many congregations and denominational programs are struggling financially, added to the embarrassment."

In fairness, it would be important to remember that these meetings are typically scheduled four years in advance, and this one in particular was set up three years ago under difficult circumstances.

2009-06-19 13:24 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Scott


Cary, North Carolina



Humility, submission to brethren and charity all around are characteristics of our Lord working in the lives of believers, and signs of our growth in Him.

The concern many of us have is that to debate our constitution (e.g. Book of Church Order), and the vows taken to uphold it as merely "policy" undermines all that. It directly disturbs the peace and purity of the church.

It's not merely a “policy” to govern the church by deacons and elders, ordained and installed. It’s doctrine from Scripture, reflected in our confession.

Our peace and unity is based on obeying our constitution or following the process to change it by amendment- not 'study' committees with pre-determined results by men whose views are already known and published, then sending out divided “pastoral letters.”

Church discipline is there so the peace, purity and unity of the church may be preserved.

2009-06-19 13:57 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Warren


SC



Yea, verily!

2009-06-26 22:21 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Wayne Brauning


Coatesville, PA



Your words were comforting and encouraging. It seems that God's grace is still prevailing among us.
We prayed for "youall!
Wish I had been there, except for the prices.

WB.

2009-06-19 14:43 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Jim Phillis


Hendersonville, NC



Thanks, Joel, for an encouraging word about the assembly from a brother who was providentially hindered from attending. I appreciate your perspective.

2009-06-19 15:46 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


William Rowe


Summerton, SC



As a past elder in New Covenant Presbyterian Church, I worry that our denomination is tending to follow the errors made by other more liberal denominations and drift away from biblical truth. Maybe not drift away so much as the acceptance of a diminished authority of the bible. The more the bible as the authoritative word of God is preached, the more I see interest grow among the flock. I wish our teaching elders would place more importance in training members in what PCA stands for under the authority of God's word, and less on making changes in things that are not broken.

2009-06-19 17:13 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Smith


TN



Would you be so kind as to send out the name of the hymn quoted for those of us who are stupid? (ia another email of course)

2009-06-19 17:13 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Joel Belz


Asheville, North Carolina



"The Church's One Foundation"

2009-06-20 00:33 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Larry Roff (Trinity Hymnal editor)


Lake Worth, FL



The phrase Joel quoted is from the third stanza of the hymn, "The Church's One Foundation" (number 347 in the "Trinity Hymnal"). And I, too, rejoice in concurring with Joel's assessment of our meeting this week.

2009-06-19 20:03 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Ivan Lambert


Winter Haven, FL



In dialog w/ a few Teaching Elders regarding the Duncan / Keller dialog, I heard the comments that their dialog was "informative, thought-provoking, something we need to do more often." I also heard these replies, "lame, tame, too nice..."

Thursday's General Assembly debate on the floor was also quite uneventful, not producing the fireworks anticipated.

Isn't this GREAT?
Last year in Dallas, revealed we too often accuse another, rather than argue well our own position.

This year, Duncan and Keller set the tone Wednesday evening. They raised the bar substantially for how we should be interacting, Thursday. Too often our passion is to seek to be understood, rather than seeking to understand, and the result is bad fruit.

Duncan and Keller provided us leadership we need. May the fruit of the Spirit be further evidenced in how we "debate" in future years. Thanks men!

2009-06-19 21:06 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Warren


SC



Scott from Cary, NC wrote:
"The concern many of us have is that to debate our constitution (e.g. Book of Church Order), and the vows taken to uphold it as merely "policy" undermines all that. It directly disturbs the peace and purity of the church.
It's not merely a “policy” to govern the church by deacons and elders, ordained and installed. It’s doctrine from Scripture, reflected in our confession. "
Precisely. One of the comparison's I've heard more recently, contrasting the PCA with the OPC, is that while in the OPC RE's & TE's generally treat their church constitution (which they take vows to support as ours do) as 'rules to live by", all too often in the PCA the constitution is merely seen as "suggestions to consider". That's a gross simplification, but it correctly assesses the trend. The problems starts with TE's who do not teach RE's well in the locally.

2009-06-19 22:36 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


David Noble


St. Louis



However, when we raise the BCO to the level of Scripture, we effectively diminish the authority of Scripture in our lives. And that is the other side of the ditch, my dear brother.

2009-06-21 15:33 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Gray Bullard


Concord, NC



Lest you be overly concerned about differences within your vital Christian assembly, know that you will always have divisions. The spirit of caritas (charity=love, Latin) between Mr. Keller and Mr. Duncan is refreshing to me and an example to all of us in dealing with differences. How would you like to be a congregant within your historical brothers and sisters, the PCUSA (from which I have come to the PCA)who are splintering along the question of whether chastity and fidelity among Christians, whether homosexual or heterosexual in orientation, is no longer a requirement, not only to be a member, but to be an elder or clergy in the Church? Be thankful that God is protecting you from worse than a healthy debate about the role of women in the church. (My wife proofread this for me, so I know whose hand rocks the cradle and my world).

2009-06-20 08:37 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Tom Troxell


Sun City West, AZ



I am sympathetic towards the idea of un-ordained deaconesses but voted no for the reason pointed out by TE Coffin. I find myself taking the report of the study committee on Federal Vision and wanting to give it exalted status, when it was a report with advise and not a provision of our BCO.
I am troubled by those who seem to ignore that what, at least what I hear, is simply a call for clarification on un-ordained deaconesses. Am I wrong on my perception? Those who argue that such a thing would put us on a slippery slope seem to be missing the point.
I do believe the best way to proceed is by overture for a BCO chane; an overture(s) carefully crafted and able to pass muster.

2009-06-20 11:47 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Steve Lawton


Greenville, SC



Joel, you have an uncanny ability to summarize fairly. Thanks! (Drat, even that took too many words!)

2009-06-20 15:51 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Larry Hoop


Holland, IA



I join the others in thanking Joel for this excellent article! However, there is one point in it I would like to correct. As a member of the Overtures Committee minority who signed the Minority Report and who was present when that report was drafted, I can say categorically that it was never intended for the proposed Committee to address the issue of women deacons. Rather, the Committee was to address the question of the involvement of women in the life and ministry of the church under our BCO as it is currently constituted. It was clear from some of the debate that this was not understood by at least a portion of the commissioners, and those of us who knew better (because we were there when the Report was written) were unable to correct this erroneous perception as the rules prevent us from participating in the debate.

2009-06-20 19:44 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


David Noble


St. Louis



Thank you for this clarification. I found myself wondering why the debate was so narrow as to miss the broader question.

2009-06-21 15:34 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Phillip


Gulfport, MS



During the Assembly presentation of the Majority and Minority reports on Overture 10, the critical issue in the midst of it all , what is pleasing and glorifying to God, the One who is to be sanctified?

2009-06-22 07:22 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Steve Hyatt


Spartanburg, SC



I appreciate the summation of GA last week. It is encouraging to see our denomination approach issues in a manner reflective of the love and respect all sides deserve.

2009-06-22 08:05 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


William H. Smith


Louisville, MS



The ultimate unifying activity of the church is worship, and it is just at that place that there is the greatest diversity of doctrine and practice in our church. We can and will survive arguments about those who may serve as deacons and many other things. But, no church will survive in the long terms whose ministers and members cannot agree on what it means to worship in spirit and truth and to approach God with reverence and fear joined to joy and genuineness.

2009-06-24 09:01 Permalink Reply

Leave a Comment

All Fields Are Required: