Eastern Carolina Overture: Prohibit Assistants to Deacons from Being Commissioned or Installed as Office Bearers

Eastern Carolina Presbytery joins Central Carolina and Evangel Presbyteries in seeking to revise Section 9-7 of the Book of Church Oder (BCO).  

With Overture 9 to the 38th General Assembly, Central Carolina asks the Assembly “to Revise BCO 9-7 to Prohibit Assistants to the Deacons from Being Commissioned or Installed as Office Bearers.”  

BCO 9-7 now reads: “It is often expedient that the Session of a church should select and appoint godly men and women of the congregation to assist the deacons in caring for the sick, the widow, the orphans, the prisoners, and others who may be in any distress or need.”

According to the Eastern Carolina overture, “This is often cited as pretext for the practice of electing and commissioning female deacons….”

Overture 9, if answered in the affirmative, would add the following language: “These assistants to the deacons shall not be referred to as deacons or deaconesses, nor are they to be elected by the congregation nor formally commissioned, ordained, or installed as though they were office bearers in the church.”

The proposed language is identical to that offered in Overture 2 from Central Carolina Presbytery.

Overture 7, from Evangel Presbytery seeks to amend BCO 9-7 by adding this sentence: "These individuals who assist the deacons, selected by means determined by each Session, are not subjects for ordination.”

To read these and other overtures please click here.

The 38th General Assembly of the PCA will be held June 29 – July 2, 2010 at the Nashville Convention Center in Nashville, Tenn. Registration information can be found here.

Comments

All Fields Are Required:


Dale


Buettner


York, PA


Very sad, though not surprising. I wish these brothers would let go of their determination to add more rules and restrictions and instead learn to enjoy the freedom the Scriptures give us. This overture is reminiscent of what Paul fought against in Galatia. Very troubling. My concern isn't so much the issue itself, but the way the three Presbyteries are going about it.

2010-03-31 13:53 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Donald


Codling


Lower Sackville, NS


I'm more than a little distressed that brothers who are keen to protect the authority of Scripture would propose legislation that adds to Scripture. Nowhere in Scripture is there any instruction about the name to be given to women who help in diaconal areas, nor is there any prohibition of choosing those who work directly with the deacons by congregational vote. It is very sad when fear trumps Scripture.

2010-04-03 18:08 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


John


Hendrickson


Middletown, NJ


What is distressing is the relentless push by those who want the ordination of women. They will not take no for an answer. It is that which necessitates such actions as this overture.

2010-04-04 20:45 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Donald


Codling


Lower Sackville, NS


WCF 1:6 “The whole counsel of God concerning all things necessary for his own glory, man’s salvation, faith and life, is either expressly set down in Scripture, or by good and necessary consequence may be deduced from Scripture: unto which nothing at any time is to be added, whether by new revelations of the Spirit, or traditions of men.”

Nowhere in Scripture is there one word forbidding that any person be called a deacon. In fact. Romans 16:1 is literally translated “Phoebe our sister, who is a deacon of the church in Cenchrea”. There is nothing in Scripture that requires us to translated the Greek word as “worker” or “servant”. So this overture is implicitly a denial of our confession in its most critical statement for guarding our orthodoxy; it calls on us to affirm a doctrine which is an addition to Scripture.

2010-05-02 20:21 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Laura


Keyser


Flourtown, PA


Jesus did such a wonderful job showing the world how to respect women. He stepped across cultural lines to give them dignity. He chastised religious men for misunderstanding His ministry to women. The apostle Paul worked alongside women for the sake of the gospel. Both Paul and Jesus understood the importance of sacrificially living out faith rather than tightening up the rules to keep people "in their place." The whole situation is heartbreaking.

2010-10-17 16:48 Permalink Reply

Leave a Comment

All Fields Are Required: