Cizik Resigns from NAE


On December 11, Richard Cizik resigned as vice president of governmental affairs for the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE), following controversial comments he made earlier this month on same-sex civil unions.

“In a December 2, 2008, broadcast interview on National Public Radio Richard responded to questions and made statements that did not appropriately represent the values and convictions of NAE and our constituents,” said Leith Anderson, president of the NAE. “Although he has subsequently expressed regret, apologized, and affirmed our values there is a loss of trust in his credibility as a spokesperson among leaders and constituents.”  

Cizik’s resignation concludes 28 years of service to the National Association of Evangelicals.

“In the 10 years that I have worked with Richard Cizik, I have come to love and appreciate him as a brother in the Lord and as a gifted and enthusiastic advocate of causes dear to evangelical Christians,” said Roy Taylor, stated clerk of the Presbyterian Church in America (PCA) and chairman of the board of the NAE. “I am saddened that his resignation became necessary. I pray that the Lord will use him in new avenues of service and influence.”

In a December 2 interview on the National Public Radio program Fresh Air, Cizik was asked about his stance on gay marriage. "I'm shifting, I have to admit,” he said. “In other words, I would willingly say that I believe in civil unions. I don't officially support redefining marriage from its traditional definition, I don't think."

Leith Anderson responded by saying, “Our NAE stand on marriage, abortion, and other biblical values is long, clear, and unchanged.”

The PCA has been a part of the National Association of Evangelicals since the denomination’s inception in 1973. “The PCA is a member of the NAE because it is consistent with our doctrine of the Church,” said Taylor. “It also enables us to have contact with other evangelical Christians beyond our Reformed community, to have a wider ministry, and to have a broader, more effective influence.” 

To learn more visit www.nae.net.

Comments

All Fields Are Required:


R.K. Wendt


Freehold, NJ



What could Cizik have been thinking? The demand by gays and lesbians for the acceptance of civil unions has only been part of a far larger strategy by gay and lesbian activists to move America incrementally toward achieving their ultimate prize, which is full recognition of their lifestyle through marriage.

2008-12-16 23:04 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


TE Brian Carpenter


Sturgis, SD



I imagine he was thinking what many evangelicals often think: "Oh, the culture doesn't like this point of view anymore! How can we win the culture if they don't like what we have to say? We better change our point of view."

2008-12-19 10:35 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Dar Ingwerson


Jackson, MS



I was dismayed to hear the NPR interview w/Cizik especially recognizing that this is exactly the type of fodder the liberal media seeks out to further their humanistic cultural agenda. I have noted of late more NPR interviews of this ilk that try to paint an emerging liberal face on evangelicalism.

2008-12-19 11:36 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Noel Weichbrodt


St. Louis, MO



Bravo to Cizik. The Church prospered for centuries in this country without the need for the federal government to support its definition of marriage. Recent tradition is a harmful, barely tenable concotion of civil religion. We must shift our focus away from the arguing the vagaries of our times and towards redeeming our cities and cultures by showing a broken mankind in need of a Saviour. Acknowledging the wisdom of civil unions is a simple step towards that.

2008-12-19 20:41 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Liz


Jackson, MS



Because God forbid that Evangelicals should be allowed to have a diversity of opinions on allowing civil unions in a secular nation. Imagine how awful it would be if Christians actually had to discuss the issue. It's so much easier just to have these kinds of people resign, you know?

Isn't the gospel more important than political lobbying? Should we really pressure someone to resign just because they have different views on a certain political issue? Will this really serve to bring more people to Christ? Because Christ, not the legal system, is the only way to revive the culture.

2008-12-20 13:25 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Culbertson


TX



A consistent Life-World-view in the Church is not to be discarded . I do appreciate Cizik's action in resigning.

2008-12-22 19:19 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Steven Cooper


California



Seems this is an amazing example of the power of incrementalism. Shouldn't we be learning from the homosexual community to follow suit? Often the church isn't wise enough to seek incremental positive gains, but demands everything to be perfect immediately.

2008-12-22 23:52 Permalink Reply

All Fields Are Required:


Lunard Lewis


Chattanooga, TN



I thought civil unions were not marriages, and were not seen as marriage by our governments. I thought that civil unions were already legal, but that homosexuals are not content with that, but demand their unions be recognized as marriage with all the rights and privileges (and tax benefits) bequeath thereto.

So, I need to understand what was biblically wrong with what Mr. Cizik said.

2009-01-23 11:51 Permalink Reply

Leave a Comment

All Fields Are Required: